top of page
Top

关于文字

 

When speaking of “word,” it’s hard for East Asian artists not to think of calligraphy. The fervor for shaping and beautifying pictographic characters—a passion cultivated over thousands of years—feels as if it's encoded in our blood, even in the context of contemporary art. I am no exception.

​

I have been entangled with word all my life. Leaving aside its cultural, philosophical, and poetic dimensions, my visual and experiential associations are many: my father was a gifted folk calligrapher whose characters adorned the gates of households and factories in our region—his writing gave me the pride and identity of my childhood. During a period of family misfortune, my teenage years were heavy with contemplation, and copying obscure classical texts became a secret weapon to suppress anxiety and enter a deeper mode of learning. In over two decades of professional artistic practice, the daily ritual of copying Buddhist sutras using traditional brush and ink has been a method of grounding and meditation—even through the unbearable cold of northern winters and the suffocating heat of summer. During the pandemic, when I was trapped in a foreign apartment longing for home, calligraphy once again became my remedy.

​

But calligraphy is not the same as word. Beyond its link to writing and bodily practice, calligraphy also carries implicit class hierarchies and cultural inertia. In contrast, word—by virtue of its intrinsic connection to meaning—possesses energy simply through its presence.

​

In contemporary visual art, word has long since broken free from the confines of calligraphy. I first realized this in my Window Series and later Palimpsest Series, where word became not only readable, but also visible—and even tangible. Its visibility goes beyond ornamentation: even when the meaning is obscured—when the viewer cannot read the language, or when the word is smudged or overwritten—it still transmits energy through form. The presence of word always evokes a mysterious spiritual tension. Beyond physical linkage, the relationship between word and meaning seems to possess a wave-like connection that cannot easily be severed.

​

In the early phase of my work (including sculpture), I was unconsciously influenced by the cultural legacy of calligraphy—through the visual and performative experience of writing. After the Window Series, I shifted toward expressing the essence of word itself—its embedded meaning. In the Palimpsest Series, I went further to explore the heterogeneity of layered scripts and the poetic friction of overlapping writing.

​

For thousands of years, word has served as the underlying code of civilization. The invention of printing diminished calligraphy, and computers further severed word from its reliance on paper. Yet paradoxically, this detachment has brought greater awareness to the weight of word within the architecture of human civilization.

​

Today, artificial intelligence is rapidly changing the traditional reliance of knowledge, skill, and even logical reasoning on the human brain. The written word—once born from the collaboration of hand, eye, and mind—is gradually losing the sacred aura that once demanded reverence. As civilization “spills” from the human brain into external systems at lightning speed, new expressive structures have emerged within machines—often surpassing our own. Will this godlike construct bring new forms of love and surprise, or will it confront us with a future we are wholly unprepared to face?

​

Such thoughts form the underlying context of my two series: Before the Word and After the Word. And the work continues to unfold.

在圣言之前

沉浸于创作的艺术家与悄悄进入洞穴作画的史前人类之间有何区别?两者都在试图表达尚未完全成形的内心感受,都运用着仍在形成过程中的事物。两者都本能地进行着一种形而上学的思考——看似无用却又深刻地关乎存在——思考着自我及其与世界的关系,即便他们创作的作品或许另有其他目的。

“文字之前”是一个意义深远的命题。它不仅指语言出现之前的时代,也指艺术创作黎明时分精神觉醒的时刻。它蕴含着哲学和艺术的双重起源——类似于现象学的还原论。在这里,“文字”不仅象征着文明的书面语言,也象征着体现个体表达的艺术语言,尤其是在东亚将书写视为个人体验的传统中。因此,书写文字的行为既成为人类文化觉醒的驱动力,或许也成为抵抗未来标准化机器语言的有力象征。

《圣言之前》系列,2025年,共13件作品

之后

语言是文明的体现。而当文明消亡时,语言也可能是最先消失的。人们谈到失落的文明时,通常指的是一个群体失去了他们的语言和文字。那么,当人类的语言系统最终被机器语言或非人类代码所取代时,又会留下什么呢?


我相信后文明世界仍会留存语言的痕迹。但这些痕迹与自然界中的痕迹截然不同。它们是碎片——曾经由人手描绘的线条,脱离意义的形状,破碎却回荡着不愿放弃旧文明秩序的回响。这些碎片或许会成为语言时代的考古遗迹。

《言语之前》和《言语之后》在视觉上有很多相似之处,这感觉很自然。一个文明体系的兴起和衰落往往构成一个闭环。但这两个系列作品的意图都指向同一个问题:如果熟悉的意义体系消失,我们还能想象另一种人类存在方式吗?是否存在对存在的另类诠释?特定文明形式的消亡并不意味着人类的灭绝。

或许真正让我们感到不安的不是损失本身,而是我们正在进化——朝着一种不同的、或许更先进的人类形态进化。

《词语之后》系列,2025年,15件

策展人说明

论“道:道之前”和“道:道之后”

罗洛对“词”的探索超越了文本本身。这两个相互交织的系列——《词:词之前》和《词:词之后》——展开了一场关于语言、意义和视觉具象的哲学探究。罗洛并非将文本视为内容或书法形式,而是将其视为一种本体论力量——记忆、直觉和文化意识的载体。

在《文字:文字之前》中,她追溯了书写的原始冲动:在语言稳定为符号之前,标记是连接自我与未知的本能姿态。这一系列作品指向一个共同的祖先时刻——那时图像和文字尚未区分,创造是一种形而上的必然。

相反,《词:词之后》设想了一个后语言世界:一个人类语言——曾经是意识的核心——被机器认知所取代的未来。她画作中支离破碎的符号和隐晦的铭文诉说着失落、变异和抵抗。即使剥离了字面意义,词语依然存在——以一种幽灵般的结构、一种痕迹、一种振动的形式。

这两个系列共同构成了一个概念上的连续体。它们提出的问题是:当意义消逝,词语还剩下什么?表达之前是什么,表达之后又是什么?在一个在存在与缺失之间摇摆不定的世界里,罗的作品既表达了哀悼,也蕴含了希望。

bottom of page